How to use AI in your research · COACT 2026 · Dr Luke Philbrooks · l.a.philbrooks@qmul.ac.uk
Find skills: skills.sh · anthropics/skills · K-Dense scientific skills | Awesome lists: MCP servers · main list
Nothing leaves your machine, but a laptop only runs small, weaker models.
COACT 2026 · Dr Luke Philbrooks · l.a.philbrooks@qmul.ac.uk
Offload the mechanics. Never the judgement.
Add: "Before you start, ask me any questions you need answered."
| Task | Where AI helps | The trap | Tools |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reading | Finding and triaging papers; mapping a field; questioning papers you've read | Summaries replace reading; invented or mis-attributed citations | Elicit, Consensus, Perplexity, Research Rabbit |
| Crossing fields | A patient tutor; loading manuals; translating jargon | Fluent answers in a field you can't yet judge. Check with a person in it | Learning modes, Gemini Notebook |
| Designing | Critic: confounders, missing controls, pre-mortem | Letting it design; confidently wrong maths; not understanding your stats | Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini (reasoning mode) |
| Analysing | Writing and running code; agents with checkpoints | Silent data changes; debugging loops; results you can't explain | Claude Code, Codex, Antigravity |
| Writing | Drafts from well-structured notes; structure; "reviewer 2" feedback | Losing your voice; AI-written discussion; sending unreviewed output | Claude, skills, style guides |
I'm new to [topic]. Teach me [concept]. Don't give me the full answer. Ask me one question at a time, check my answer, and explain only when I'm stuck. Finish by asking me to explain it back.
Here is my protocol. Don't rewrite it. List the three most serious threats to validity, most serious first. For each, say what a sceptical reviewer would ask. Be specific; skip generic advice.
My results: [...]. My interpretation: [...]. What are the strongest objections? Which alternative explanations have I not addressed? Don't rewrite my text.
Write a hand-off note for a fresh chat: project goal in two sentences; what we did and which files changed; decisions and why; open problems; next steps. Under 300 words.